The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in a
post yesterday, disputes the claim that letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire on taxpayers earning over $250,000 will impact job creation by small businesses:
The arguments against allowing the high-end tax cuts to expire on
schedule echo those made against President Clinton’s proposed 1993 tax
increases, which set marginal rates at the levels to which they are set
to return when the Bush rate cuts expire. Critics claimed at the time
that those tax increases would seriously harm economic growth and even
send the economy back into recession. As it turned out, job creation
and economic growth proved significantly stronger following the 1993 tax
increases than following the 2001 Bush tax cuts. Further,
small businesses generated jobs at twice the rate during the Clinton
years than they did under the Bush tax code.
. . .
Extending the tax cuts on incomes in excess of $250,000 would add
nearly $1 trillion to deficits over 2013 to 2022, but benefit only about
the highest-income 2 percent of households.[27]
The biggest benefits would flow to the very highest-income people: as
Figures 3 shows, more than 80 percent of the value of the upper-income
tax cuts would go to people who make more than $1 million a year.
As
discussed above, very few of the high-income taxpayers who benefit from
the upper-income tax cuts are in fact “small businesses” in the way the
term is commonly understood. Moreover, there is no good evidence that
cutting the taxes of small business owners is an effective way to boost
hiring or growth in either the short run or the long run.
Policymakers
ought not let myths and lobbyists’ slogans regarding high-income
taxpayers and small businesses drive them toward a costly policy that
would add heavily to deficits while delivering little economic benefit.
No comments:
Post a Comment